07 Sep But presuming this Joi is not unique: Isn’t this an evolution that is plausible of?
However you can’t blame Joi for that, right? You can’t phone Joi a traitor if you don't also can phone Siri or Alexa a traitor squirt mobile. Joi does not make alternatives; she follows development. I’ve been referring to Joi as "her" this entire time, but "it" is probably more accurate; sex, like every thing additionally about Joi, is just a construct built to attract towards the heterosexual male whom purchased her. And in case Joi’s "death" at the hands of Luv is tragic, it is just because we bought in to the dream created for K, whom relied on her behalf as a companion and confidant as he plunged to the situation.
To be clear: I’m basing this back at my own reading of Joi, which will be the absolute most cynical one. You might install a plausible instance that K’s form of Joi does indeed develop some amount of sentience, and that her insistence on K’s uniqueness—and her increasingly separate agency, damn the consequences—make her as "human" as any individual or replicant in Blade Runner 2049’s world. (The Blade Runner world relies upon concerns similar to this. That’s what helps it be interesting. )
But presuming this Joi is not unique: Isn’t this a plausible development of pornography? That a business might establish synthetic intelligence that is clearly made to treat a sad, lonely guy while the tragically misinterpreted hero in their very own life? Is not it plausible that the long term is plagued by unfortunate males, whoever very very very own versions of Joi are scouring the streets for "pleasure models" who can act as their intimate surrogates?